B’nai Brith reports:
A sign alluding to a historical massacre of Jews was carried openly at the annual al-Quds Day hatefest in downtown Toronto …The sign depicts the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem and warns that, ‘The last Khayber is ready,’ an allusion to an ancient battle in which a Muslim army defeated and slaughtered Jews in the Arabian Peninsula. It also predicts the coming of “the last Hayder,” a nickname for Ali, the leading figure in Shi’a Islam. Shi’a clerics are among the speakers and organizers of the Toronto al-Quds rally, and many attendees are brought by buses from Shi’a mosques across the Greater Toronto Area.
This is a clear-cut exhibit of what constitutes ‘hate’ under Canada’s hate laws. The al-Quds Day ‘hatefest’ also includes incitement to violence against Jews.
Canada has long faced the ongoing challenge of trying to determine when the line is crossed into breaking its anti-hate laws. Such laws were once fair and functional. They were intended to protect minorities from real hate, during an era where minorities routinely struggled to find employment, were subject to name-calling, bullying, intimidation and physical violence because of sheer discrimination and intolerance of their difference; not their behaviors.
Like elsewhere in Western countries, in comes Islamic supremacism into Canada’s landscape to undo the sincere intent of anti-hate laws. And it is causing the worst divisions in Canada, as seen across the globe, despite “far right” and “nationalists” being blamed for such divisions. Canada saw “quasi-judicial panels’, aka. kangaroo courts, step in to appease Islamic supremacists, and thus activate a divisive debate on what constitutes “hate”, when it’s original intent and definition should be obvious. Given the powerful presence of Islamic supremacist lobbies, and anti-Islamophobia motion M-103, the journey for Canada has been a rough one. Also threatened are its Constitution and individual rights and freedoms.
The CBC noted from back in 2008 about the witch-hunt against Mark Stein…
Steyn, at the moment, is effectively being tried, by a quasi-judicial panel in Vancouver, for insulting Islam… Normally, that’s the sort of proceeding you’d expect to hear about in Saudi Arabia or Iran, not the West. But the British Columbia Human Rights Commission, in the cause of protecting minorities, asserts its right to judge and even restrict speech.
Except, that other ‘minorities’ have not caused such a ruckus in Canada.
It is ironic that criticism of Islam is deemed to be ‘hate’ by social justice warriors and Islamic supremacists in Canada, when al Quds rallies exhibit real hate and pose dangers, yet they have been tolerated year in and year out.
Recently, new legislation (Bill 84) was introduced by York Centre Member of Provincial Parliament Roman Baber: “the Prohibiting Hate-Promoting Demonstrations at Queen’s Park Act”. The impetus was precisely against the likes of Al Quds rallies.
Lianne Laurence reported in Lifesite news that the bill was intended to “ban any ‘demonstration, rally or other activity that, in the opinion of the Speaker, is likely to promote hatred against any identifiable group’ on Queen’s Park grounds.” The article also reported that “Bill 84 has the support of a number of Conservative MPPs and is endorsed by the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) and the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center (FSWC).” This Ontario bill (not Canada) was intended to target real hate that endangers innocent minorities, in keeping with the original mandate of Canada’s anti-hate laws. It was not intended to be a launch against free speech and against “Christians” as implied in the article. In fact, Ontario Conservative Premier Doug Ford has experienced blowback for his own stance on valuing the freedom of speech of others, in the face of offending Islam.
Here is some noteworthy background about the Member of Provincial Parliament Roman Baber who tabled the bill:
When Baber introduced Bill 84, it was a next-step of a previous motion from 2016. Baber noted that “ a motion in the legislature in 2016….condemned the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against Israel”, and that Ontario Premier Doug Ford “pledged to end the annual Al-Quds Day rally, in which Jews and Israel are targeted”, even though “the premier didn’t say how.” Baber further stated that “he was proud of the premier for displaying courage and condemning Al-Quds Day.”
Baber comes from a history that has impacted his concern about genuine human rights. “He was eight when his family left the Soviet Union in 1989, two years before the country’s collapse. He also recalls that country’s anti-Semitism. The words “Israel” and “America” were dangerous to utter, so his parents, like many Jews, hid their religion.”
Baber has stated:
As a Jewish politician, one of my primary obligations is the welfare of the Jewish people…..“There’s no question that as a Jewish politician, one of my primary obligations is the welfare of the Jewish people, and that includes the security of Israel.”
B’nai Brith notes that “year after year, speakers at the Toronto al-Quds Day rally have praised terrorists and incited hatred against Jews and Israelis.”
It is time for this to stop as well as the cry-wolf routine of Islamic supremacists whenever their mandate of subversion is challenged or Muslim feelings are hurt.
“Sign Threatening Massacre of Jews Brandished at Toronto al-Quds Day Rally”, B’nai Brith Canada, June 3, 2019:
TORONTO – A sign alluding to a historical massacre of Jews was carried openly at the annual al-Quds Day hatefest in downtown Toronto on Saturday afternoon.
The sign depicts the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem and warns that, “The last Khayber is ready,” an allusion to an ancient battle in which a Muslim army defeated and slaughtered Jews in the Arabian Peninsula. It also predicts the coming of “the last Hayder,” a nickname for Ali, the leading figure in Shi’a Islam.
Shi’a clerics are among the speakers and organizers of the Toronto al-Quds rally, and many attendees are brought by buses from Shi’a mosques across the Greater Toronto Area.
In 2017, the use of a related slogan at a Mississauga, Ont., protest sparked an online furor and a temporary ban on anti-Israel rallies at the city’s Celebration Square.
As in previous years, flags of the Hezbollah terrorist organization and the Islamist regime in Iran were also spotted at the rally.
Rally organizers admitted that they did not have a permit to block city streets. On May 14, Toronto City Council voted unanimously to crack down on “hate activity” taking place on city property without a permit.
“The continued appearance of threatening and antisemitic slogans at the Toronto al-Quds Day rally is a shame upon our city,” said Michael Mostyn, Chief Executive Officer of B’nai Brith Canada. “City officials must act to enforce the word of City Council and make the organizers pay for the hatred and disruption that they repeatedly cause.
“We are already seeing signs that political pressure is reducing the pull of al-Quds Day – but we cannot afford to leave the job half-done.”
Attendance at this year’s al-Quds Day rally was noticeably lower than last year. Moreover, for the first time since the hatefest began in Toronto, attendees did not approach Queen’s Park, the seat of Ontario’s government. Instead, they had to content themselves with circling the U.S. Consulate, while approximately one hundred Toronto Police officers stood by to keep the peace.
Year after year, speakers at the Toronto al-Quds Day rally have praised terrorists and incited hatred against Jews and Israelis. Last year, a featured speaker said he was praying for the “eradication” of Israelis. In 2013 and 2016, speakers called for Israelis to be shot, and in 2014, a Muslim cleric called for “Yahoodi” (Arabic for “Jewish”) to be “dismantled.”….
Tom says
Just as with all real hate speakers, give them an inch and they will take a mile
The al-Quds day march has a history of allowing or promoting hate speech in public, especially agains Jews.
Canadian politicians have been found to be in attendance on numerous occasions when hate spewing speakers have been on stage.
If politicians of Conservative leaning had attended rallies involving “White Supremacists” or others labeled by the left or Islamists as “Alt Right” the proverbial excrement would hit the fan and the wailing on the msm or social media condemning them as hate mongers would be so loud and repetitive that we would think the world was ending.
But the lack of ANY criticism from the msm or social media butterflies is deafening and speaks volumes about their lack of an understanding of right and wrong.
Trudeau and his Liberals have done a magnificent job of emulating Joseph Goebbels the Nazi propaganda minister. They have turned the minds of many in Canada to the dark side of acceptance of hate toward some, and the turning of a blind eye to it when it comes from Islam.
Tom says
This Rebel Media video of an interview at the al-Quds protest with a Muslim man who lets it all slip out. This is how emboldened the Islamists are becoming.
https://www.therebel.media/toronto-muslim-al-quds-day-rally-executing-gays-part-of-sharia-law-replacement-birth-rates
Carol the 1st says
A good 2016 video that bear matters out: (watch Part 2 also):
Canada Defiance Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAcJkMkKCh8
Lightship Chaplain says
Don’t these politicians understand that within a couple generations all of “Christendom” (the West) will be out-bred by Muslims? They look at redistricting for votes, yet miss the greater issue of our time! I would have never believed since the 911 attacks, these idiots would then choose suicide, and it just won’t be the Jews being exterminated, but anyone they consider an infidel! Studies show they only need to be 20% of the population to be a threat to personal liberties, this has been confirmed geographically!
Leon Degney says
Yes 20% is the generally accepted “critical mass” to set of the chain reaction of elimination.
Terry Gain says
I think that Muslims will have reached the tipping point when they are a mere 5% of the population. At that point they can form a solid voting block which will hold the balance of power. Continuing Muslim immigration will follow and the choice will eventually become submission or civil war. Britain has obviously chosen submission. Canada is finished if Trudeau is reelected and Scheer may not have the intelligence or testicular fortitude to take on the immigration issue.
Carol the 1st says
You’d think Maxime Bernier didn’t exist from the little you hear.
carpediadem says
Gee how terrible that it’s everyone, not “just” Jews being threatened.
Jews are the most prominent victims of Islam due to the Koranic imperative but all infidels were and are always at risk.
gravenimage says
Yes–I care about all the victims of Islam, most definitely including the very threatened Jews.
Lightship Chaplain says
I don’t know if my comment posted, so I’m submitting it again…
Don’t these politicians understand that within a couple generations all of “Christendom” (the West) will be out-bred by Muslims? They look at redistricting for votes, yet miss the greater issue of our time! I would have never believed since the 911 attacks, these idiots would then choose suicide, and it just won’t be the Jews being exterminated, but anyone they consider an infidel! Studies show they only need to be 20% of the population to be a threat to personal liberties, this has been confirmed geographically!
commonsense says
Actually, the threat factor rises sharply when Muslims comprise only about TEN per cent of the population.
Dan says
I’ve seen articles on how the percentage of Muslims in a population affects behavior numerous times. A quick search brought up this article and, while it’s not one I’ve seen before so I don’t know anything about the author, the stats are close to what I remember from other pieces.
*** One percent ***
“As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone….”
Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections.
United States: 1.0
Australia: 1.5
Canada: 1.9
China: 1.0-2.0
Italy: 1.5
Norway: 1.8
*** Two to three percent ***
“At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.”
Denmark: 2.0
Germany: 3.7
United Kingdom: 2.7
Spain: 4.0
Italy: 4.6
*** Five percent and over ***
“From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (“clean” by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves – along with threats for failure to comply (United States).”
France: 8.0
Philippines: 5.0
Sweden: 5.0
Switzerland: 4.3
The Netherlands: 5.5
Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8
“At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
*** Ten percent and over ***
“When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris – car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark – Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh).”
Guyana: 10.0
India: 13.4
Israel: 16.0
Kenya: 10.0
Russia: 10.0-15.0
The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders.
*** Twenty percent and over ***
“After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia: 32.8
*** Forty percent and over ***
“After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:”
Bosnia: 40.0
Chad: 53.1
Lebanon: 59.7
*** Sixty percent and over ***
“From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:”
Albania: 70.0
Malaysia: 60.4
Qatar: 77.5
Sudan: 70.0
*** Eighty percent and over ***
“After 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:”
Bangladesh: 83.0
Egypt: 90.0
Gaza: 98.7
Indonesia: 86.1
Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0
Jordan: 92.0
Morocco: 98.7
Pakistan: 97.0
Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0
Tajikistan: 90.0
Turkey: 99.8
United Arab Emirates: 96.0
I question the inclusion of “Palestine” in this set. “Palestine” simply means space occupied by stateless “Palestinians” in Gaza and the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn “religious,” and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide that predates the Holocaust.
*** One Hundred percent ***
“100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ – the Islamic House of Peace’ [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim.”
Afghanistan: 100.0
Saudi Arabia: 100.0
Somalia: 100.0
Yemen: 99.9
“Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
“‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.’ Leon Uris, The Haj.
“It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average[s] would indicate.”
“Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.”
underbed cat says
The Islamic invasion to bring sharia doctrine had to be implemented “slowly over time” to be accepted and to allow the establishment of organizations for support. our.They understood that it could not be accepted without major preparation and influence. The movement needed time to achieve educational credentials, military diversity to use words of deception to allow working with the national security some clueless but now influenced. The denial that the soldiers of Islam are really muslims in a special group, the jihadist, allowed to terrorize, military and civilians to get submission to bring sharia was the hidden conquest goal that could lead to indoctrination and suppression of a culture. It was done by hiding the history of jihad that was clever and cohesive to hide itself. It would be accomplished by demanding the silencing of free speech forbidden in the Quran and purging of words that leads to identification of Islam that would bring resistance. Many politicians did not know about the deceptive camera work, never to miss a Hamas stone throw, to create a picture of of repression and misidentify who oppress, in the past limiting the reporting of Hamas attacks.
Some visual omission created a the public that sees “radicals” activated by what? Israel trying to survive, established a state to bring safety for Jews and Christians. Otherwise the control and growing conversion of the United States would bring resistance and jihad/ sharia law would never be confirmed. Open borders and mass crossings were vehemently denied for the potential growing crisis. al Quds day parade is an example of what happens when the Quran is not identified, not read and Islamic history is not common knowledge, as the fog over covers sedition to replace or alter the Constitution will it also occur in the streets of America?
Except for the likes of Robert Spencer and the many red pill briefs of Coughlin, counter jihadists, ex muslims testimony the light is breaking thru. But Canada is on the track of open borders and dangerously foolishly unaware of the doctrine of Islam and the signal and history of this unawareness are the parades that are not understood to be celebrating a threat to return to fight Jews and Christian or intolerance of other religions. The history jihadist killing Jews after acting deceptively peaceful, with it’s first arrival in Media to convert but were rejected, and the historical return to Medina after first the first rejection to convert, only to reenter Medina with an army to slaughter the non compliant Jewish tribe Limiting speech in Canada and Europe is not a good idea. The fears of Canadians and Americans. European waking up don’t want to be taken by the very clever. In my opinion.
Dan says
Don’t know why my first effort wouldn’t post but, I’m trying again.
I’ve read articles stating how Muslims behave as their percentages rise. This article isn’t one I’ve seen before, so I don’t know about the author but, the stats are close to what I remember.
“As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone….”
Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections.
United States: 1.0
Australia: 1.5
Canada: 1.9
China: 1.0-2.0
Italy: 1.5
Norway: 1.8
“At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.”
Denmark: 2.0
Germany: 3.7
United Kingdom: 2.7
Spain: 4.0
Italy: 4.6
“From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (“clean” by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves – along with threats for failure to comply (United States).”
France: 8.0
Philippines: 5.0
Sweden: 5.0
Switzerland: 4.3
The Netherlands: 5.5
Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8
“At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
“When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris – car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark – Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh).”
Guyana: 10.0
India: 13.4
Israel: 16.0
Kenya: 10.0
Russia: 10.0-15.0
The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders.
“After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia: 32.8
“After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:”
Bosnia: 40.0
Chad: 53.1
Lebanon: 59.7
“From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:”
Albania: 70.0
Malaysia: 60.4
Qatar: 77.5
Sudan: 70.0
“After 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:”
Bangladesh: 83.0
Egypt: 90.0
Gaza: 98.7
Indonesia: 86.1
Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0
Jordan: 92.0
Morocco: 98.7
Pakistan: 97.0
Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0
Tajikistan: 90.0
Turkey: 99.8
United Arab Emirates: 96.0
I question the inclusion of “Palestine” in this set. “Palestine” simply means space occupied by stateless “Palestinians” in Gaza and the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn “religious,” and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide that predates the Holocaust.
“100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ – the Islamic House of Peace’ [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim.”
Afghanistan: 100.0
Saudi Arabia: 100.0
Somalia: 100.0
Yemen: 99.9
“Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
“‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.’ Leon Uris, The Haj.
“It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average[s] would indicate.”
“Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.”
BVC says
Dan
That is a modern day horror. I read your post twice, and it clicked. You can actually envision it, and see it confirmed in the headlines. Especially the 100% (or appx), sunni vs shite (spelling?). They kill each other off for trivial matters.
And as for Canada, do we actually need to define “hate speech” for you? What more evidence do you need to arrest these people? Are you waiting for hate SPEECH to turn into hate ACTION? The blood will be on the Canadian officials hands if this turns into a massacre.
The Political Oracle says
Please visit this link to learn what religion is not https://youtu.be/sMfXdjbHloc Contact your local, state and federal officials to educate them. You are the only hope!
Oren Wysocki says
If muslims do not justify and defend the memory of muslims massacring the Jews, then popular opinion in the muslim world will turn against the radical muslims, muslims will become ashamed of supporting the massacre of the Jews, and nonmuslims will be able to prosecute muslims who support massacring the Jews. Taqiyya in the time of global communication can harm islam as well, weakening its resolve, from their perspective, filling muslims with impurities. Forcing them to stand up for the truth of the Jews deserving subjugation openly. The final days are different than the days of coexistence. Everything leads up to completion, the people of the book are not accommodated with the jizya, the christians are all forcibly converted and Jews are exterminated. In G-d I trust.
Lydia Church says
True Christians will never be forcibly converted, we will be exterminated. In that case the Jews will be forcibly converted. See the difference?
End PC says
When will Canadians realize that the Qur’an is a motherload of hate, especially against the Jews, and that Muhammad was the greatest leader of this hate.
Renate says
More of Trudeau’s “sunny ways”.
Dawne Swift says
In some other western countries the light seems to be dawning and people seem to have started to realise what is going on, but Canada just seems to progress on its path to annihilation? New Zealand unfortunately seems to be going the same way.
David John Peirce says
https://www.facebook.com/iwillfearnoevilshop/photos/p.1267119846771388/1267119846771388/?type=3&eid=ARB51RBvsxrSuiDKvC75XlgvZH6p1ftOrkyYA38MjO6LYxNcGH1G5UTK-mkRqepOM5uk3fTjpJlEprfPAjLvHvUCMxZvRmeoTu4L0TE&__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARA4k6V3zxiUnrf6JtpqAoB07htb0wH-TOqGSjZMw7MKa-i6Ql3FdkFC5U7Cl-ky_F2zhwYXiI2p3XnfT4p0sZNtKaV1EvPtwjAmQgK9fiEsuIygZwVQXLQbRWGiqWjpCifI36UgJp1gE19fAI1dhcKGyOoVId9imoVf7MUFH6hjLUPSjE0N2Eep1PxiKo0YPKjJKwcKMN5l7Ahk72JCYZrhBQ&__tn__=EHH-R
think I go to it wearing this t shirt
https://www.facebook.com/iwillfearnoevilshop/photos/p.1267119846771388/1267119846771388/?type=3&theater
b.a. freeman says
Such laws were once fair and functional.
—
no, they were not; such laws, regardless in which republic they are in effect, are *always* excessive and liable to being “played” by criminals such as pious muslims. all that is truly necessary in *any* real republic is laws that are neutral with respect to religion, gender, race, or whatever, and *EVEN-HANDED* enforcement of same. when laws adding penalties when a privileged class is protected are passed, members of the protected class are free to abuse the “hate” law by making false accusations against whichever enemy they choose; the power of the State is then wielded on their behalf against the “hater,” who must spend his own resources defending himself, while the abuser need not spend one penny. thus, hate laws are the *best* way to break up a republic by balkanizing its citizens into competing, warring classes. one would have to be a moron not to understand such a simple concept.
well, let me back that up a bit; one would have to be UNEDUCATED not to understand such a simple concept. and since the left, which completely controls education, is indoctrinating its victims (students) rather than educating them …
Dano says
I am at ground zero of this mess. There are so many problems that I don’t know where to begin. I can say that the weapons of hate laws are only pointed in one direction. It’s sickening to watch.
Lydia Church says
Yes, and this is intentionally orchestrated that way. It’s another piece of the puzzle in the globalist tyranny agenda.
Lydia Church says
From the first to the last… they are all ‘hayders’ anyway!
gravenimage says
Canada fights “hate”, while jihadist sign threatening “massacre of Jews” flaunted at Toronto al-Quds Day rally
……………..
Yes–this “peace” sign is all about genocide of the Jews.
UNCLE VLADDI says
At some point, people are going to have to have islam declared as the world’s largest and oldest ongoing crime and murder gang that it’s always been, still is, and always will be, and then either have these companies criminally charged for acting as willing accessories to the muslims’ crimes by suppressing evidence of same, and also thereby at least tacitly endorsing them – and/or arrange class-action lawsuits against them. Endorsing crimes and destroying evidence of crimes is a crime.
EVERY instance of muslims making death threats should be investigated and the perps charged with the crimes. How hard is it to track IP addresses anyway? The cops in charge of those not doing so should be fired and jailed for covering up, aiding and abetting all muslim crimes as willing accessories after the fact and for actively conspiring to be willing accessories before the fact.
EVERY instance of muslims making death threats should be investigated and the perps charged with the crimes. How hard is it to track IP addresses anyway? The cops in charge of those not doing so should be fired and jailed for covering up, aiding and abetting all muslim crimes as willing accessories after the fact and for actively conspiring to be willing accessories before the fact.
The only reason the people in charge don’t do so is fear and racism:
HERE’S WHY LIBERAL RACISTS DEFEND MUSLIM CRIMES:
Without bothering to investigate it, liberals always deny islam could ever be a threat because muslims are brown people who can never be a threat to white people because, to racist liberals, they’re always presumed to be mentally inferior to all whites.
So there’s never any need to investigate islam, because it’s just some sort of a silly and ultimately harmless brown-person’s superstition, to which they’re racially entitled. There’s no way it could ever be a threat to whites, nor could it have inspired Nazis.
Only whites, by dint of their superior intelligence, can be evil racists who are always the main threat to the inferior browns.
To racist and mentally delinquent liberal criminals, only whites can be held to be guilty of any crimes, because crimes require mens-rea guilty mind criminal intent, which no black or brown mentally inferior muslim can ever have the mental capacity to be.
Further, all whites are Christians, so Christianity is oppressive; and all blacks are muslims, and so are naturally the victims of all the evil white Christians.
These are the most shallow, visceral feelings of all hateful liberal racists, which mere facts will never affect, because these feelings are so self-evident that there’s never any reason to consider that most Christians today are black Africans, not smug and plump white Europeans in business suits – nor that muslims come in all races and colours, too; nor that Arabs are whites. And there’s no way Muhammad was “the Whitest of men” who owned black slaves.
UNCLE VLADDI says
“Hate” is a subjective, emotional term, unrelated to any real-life, cause-and-effect situational circumstances.
At best, it means one “opposes” something which gormless legislators have never even bothered to define. So to ban “Hate!” is to ban other people from opposing whatever one currently wants to ban them from.
In the end, it means one mustn’t object to whatever the legislators deem should not be opposed, lest hurt feelings ensue; and hurting criminals’ feelings by daring to accuse them of their “crimes” is the worst sin – to libertine “liberal” criminals, that is!
So yes, your bill does have a liberal victimologist feel to it.
But Conservatives are supposed to rely on logic, reason, facts, rationality, and truth – not on hurt feelings.
ALL liberal “hate-speech laws” ARE crimes!!!
The whole concept of “hate speech” (laws against hurt feelings) is political correctness run amok, a leftist anti-free-speech tool that provides an unlimited excuse to shut down and punish anyone who openly disagrees with establishment dicta. Every totalitarian state has similar laws designed to protect the rulers. Such laws have no place in a free society.
SO: What is “hate-speech” and why should it be considered a crime if it’s NOT already: a) a threat; and b) slander (fraud)?
If it’s not either PHYSICALLY threatening speech – or emotionally threatening BECAUSE it could physically impact one’s life, like how fraudulent slander causes other people to react to one as if one were a criminal in need of hating and beating – then it’s THE TRUTH: and so it SHOULD cause one the emotional distress of ‘hurt feelings!’ So it isn’t objectively “offensive,” but is, in fact, socially beneficial in that it helps defend society from criminals, whether or not said predictably victim-blaming criminal is subjectively “offended” by their victims being notified about THEIR offenses!
Having no facts to justify their aggressive hypocrisy, all criminals will resort to using emotive ‘arguments’ to justify their crimes by playing the victims. So they (liberals, muslims) can be relied on to try to criminalize hurt feelings and to make offending people, (i.e: the criminals, by accusing them of their crimes) illegal, too!
ALL “Hate-Speech Laws” ARE CRIMES!
“Progressive” criminals – who like all criminals desire an equality of outcome over a true equality of opportunity, and to get it will always try to socially engineer ever-more rights and ever-less responsibilities for them selves, by offloading their responsibilities onto their victims by stealing their victims’ rights – pretend to hold submissive masochism as the highest virtue (for their victims to hold, not them) and the ultimate crime to be causing offense and hurting other people’s (criminal’s) feelings, (i.e: by accusing them of their crimes).
So they want to make it illegal to accuse criminals of their crimes, since that might hurt their feelings and in offending them with the often-painful truth, “make” them commit even more crimes!
Is there anything which really ought to qualify as hate speech and be banned?
NO – not because it’s “hateful” (because that sort of nonsense is only making subjective assessments based on emotions;) and “HATE” is really only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing crimes (like islam); without ‘hate’ we would never bother to accuse criminals of their crimes in order to stop those crimes.
Unreasonable false displays of hatred and anger on the other hand, are what the Left is good at – but that’s already illegal, not because of the anger displayed – that’s just the outrageous holier-than-thou virtue-signalling packaging used to disguise their preposterous extortion attempts – but because it’s fraudulent slander.
Such criminal leftists who try to make “hate” into a crime, only ever make it ‘illegal’ to hate crime itself!
Speech which is already disallowed is incitement of immediate violence and death-threats … and even those aren’t illegal, if say they call for the police to use violence to counter ongoing mob violence and looting, or call for the death-penalty for murderers!
TO LIBERALS, being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
Now think: Say your silly bill gets passed – and the liberals get re-elected. Guess what they will deem to be “hate!” and ban?
You got it: any and all cases of Conservatives using logic, reason, facts, rationality, and truth to oppose the liberals’ own criminal “hurt feelings laws.”
Our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope.
Not exactly worth even personally defending, much less legislating government force against! Emotions aren’t even thoughts, much less morals. They are always effects, never causes.